![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUhGX0Si0arnwj2swAnhC1QGJPJ845jbVPWU8e3mJehJvIF14O91jIYSB8ZIZqoN0CZlk98CnJglzWehJSZ2kGfTVIljs507qeztT-CYfn-X2Sh6CV6cgrxAGBbrl2m1dg8X8U5f0bCqU/s200/namus_logo.gif)
A new online database promises to crack some of the nation's 100,000 missing persons cases and provide answers to desperate families, but only a fraction of law enforcement agencies are using it.
It basically offers a quick way to check whether a missing person might be among the 40,000 sets of unidentified remains that languish at any given time with medical examiners across the country. NamUs is free, yet many law enforcement agencies still aren't aware of it, and others aren't convinced they should use their limited staff resources to participate.
Janice Smolinski hopes that changss and soon. Her son, Billy, was 31 when he vanished five years ago. The Cheshire, Conn., woman fears he was murdered, his body hidden away.
Some recent successes:
--Paula Beverly Davis, of the Kansas City, Mo., area, had been missing for 22 years until a relative saw a public service announcement on TV in October for NamUs and told her sister, who gave it a try. Among the 10 matches her sister found were a body dumped in Ohio in 1987 that had the same rose and unicorn tattoos as her sister. DNA tests confirmed the body was Davis.
--Sonia Lente disappeared in 2002. In June 2009, an amateur cybersleuth with the Doe Network, a nationwide volunteer group that helps law enforcement solve cold cases, noticed similarities between Lente's description in NamUs and an unidentified body found near Albuquerque, N.M., in 2004. Dental records later established it was Lente.
"It's kind of time-consuming, but I think it's a worthwhile program," - local police officer said
No comments:
Post a Comment